An Oxford University philosophy fellow compared and contrasted the biblical and transhumanist worldviews during Dallas Baptist University’s fourth annual Baptist Distinctives Lecture.
Transhumanism is a philosophical and scientific movement advocating the use of current and future technology to improve and advance humanity using cyborg implants, cryonics, germline editing, nanotechnology and mind uploading or connecting the mind to the internet.
Max Baker-Hytch noted transhumanism mirrors key elements of the biblical narrative, even as it departs from it in crucial ways.
Transhumanism “lays claim to some of the key features of the Christian story,” Baker-Hytch said, including the belief humanity has cosmic significance, something has gone wrong with the human condition, and transformation is needed to reach a better future.
What about redemption and renewal?
Likewise, transhumanism presents a parallel vision of redemption and renewal, but “with a huge twist,” he added. Redemption and renewal don’t come through God, but through human technological ingenuity, according to transhumanists.
Baker-Hytch warned transhumanism is a rising cultural ideology that seeks to redefine human nature through advancing technology.
Human identity
Baker-Hytch described transhumanism as more than a technological trend, calling it a worldview that seeks to reshape humanity itself.
“It’s an ideology that looks to technology to dramatically transform what it means to be human, … ultimately, to attain something like salvation, even eternal life,” Baker-Hytch said.
Transhumanist ideas are increasingly visible in culture, technology, and media, he noted.
A central focus of the lecture was comparing transhumanism with a biblical understanding of human identity.
Baker-Hytch argued transhumanism emphasizes enhancing human capabilities, while Christianity emphasizes transformation of character.
“If the fundamental problem with us is not that we’re not smart enough or strong enough, but that we’re self-centered, then no amount of technological reengineering is going to fix that,” he said.
A biblical approach to advancement
Baker-Hytch connected these concerns to the Baptist principles of the priesthood of believers and freedom of conscience, offering a framework for how Christians might respond to rapidly advancing technology.
He warned transhumanism, particularly as it is driven by a small group of influential tech leaders, risks concentrating decision-making power in the hands of what he described as a kind of “priesthood of technocrats.”
In contrast, he emphasized the Baptist conviction that every individual believer is responsible before God for discerning how to think, believe, and act — a responsibility that cannot be outsourced to institutions, governments, or algorithms.
He also highlighted freedom of conscience as especially relevant in an age of artificial intelligence and data-driven systems, which can subtly shape human behavior and decision-making.
Because Baptists have historically affirmed no one can believe or reason on another’s behalf, Baker-Hytch argued Christians must remain vigilant in preserving their moral and intellectual agency.
Rather than passively adopting new technologies, believers are called to engage them thoughtfully, ensuring their use aligns with a biblical understanding of human dignity, responsibility and the image of God, he said.
Baker-Hytch concluded by encouraging attendees to approach technological advancement with wisdom and intentional reflection.
“We need to test everything and think carefully about how we engage the opportunities and challenges before us,” he said.
“Each individual believer that comprises the body of Christ has a profound responsibility before God for how we steward our abilities and gifts.”
EDITOR’S NOTE — This story was written by Kendall Lyons and originally published by Baptist Standard.
